In both situations, a belief that people had completely given themselves over to failed them in very serious ways. The accusing group was not easily trusted again (Clifford 364). In the second, a group spread rumors about a religious organization that they believed to be true, but were in fact false (Clifford 364). In the first, a man lets a ship sail that he has convinced himself is seaworthy, despite obvious indications to the contrary, and it sinks with everyone onboard (Clifford 364). For the purposes of this paper, the writer will investigate Clifford’s claims further, and make a personal judgment on whether his theory of belief is right or wrong.Ĭlifford starts his argument with two stories of unsupported belief. He also claimed that if one did not have the time to fully investigate a matter they wished to believe in, then they had no time to believe in anything at all. Clifford was of the opinion that no one should believe anything for which there was “insufficient evidence”. Clifford, a British philosopher, it is both. Is blind belief foolish, or even dangerous? According to the writings of W.K.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |